JPG vs PNG vs WebP: which image format should you use?

JPG, PNG and WebP are the three image formats you meet every day. Each is best at something different. This short guide tells you which one to use, and when to convert.

JPG to PNGPNG to JPGJPG to WEBPPNG to WEBP

The short answer

JPG

JPG has been the photo format since the 1990s. It compresses photos very well by removing detail the eye barely notices. Every device, app and website supports it.

Weak points: no transparency, and text or sharp edges get blurry halos at low quality. Saving a JPG again and again loses a little more detail each time.

PNG

PNG is lossless: it stores every pixel exactly. It keeps sharp edges and supports transparency, which makes it ideal for logos, icons, screenshots and graphics you will edit again.

Weak point: photos saved as PNG are very large, often five to ten times bigger than JPG.

WebP

WebP was made by Google for the web. It can do what both JPG and PNG do: lossy compression for photos and transparency for graphics, in files usually 25 to 35 percent smaller. Every current browser shows WebP.

Weak point: some older programs, upload forms and print shops still do not accept it.

Side by side

JPGPNGWebP
Best forPhotosGraphics, screenshotsWebsites
CompressionLossyLosslessLossy or lossless
TransparencyNoYesYes
AnimationNoNoYes
Photo file sizeSmallVery largeSmallest
SupportEverywhereEverywhereAll current browsers, most apps

When to convert

Frequently asked questions

Is PNG better quality than JPG?

PNG is lossless, so it never loses detail. For photos a high-quality JPG looks the same and is far smaller; for text and graphics PNG looks sharper.

Is WebP better than JPG?

For websites, yes: smaller files at the same quality. For sharing and printing, JPG is still more widely accepted.

Does converting JPG to PNG improve quality?

No. It stops further loss, but cannot restore detail the JPG already removed.